ZUG, Switzerland, March 12 (Reuters) - The tidy towns and mountain vistas of Switzerland are an unlikely setting for an oil boom.
Yet a wave of energy companies has in the last few months announced plans to move to Switzerland -- mainly for its appeal as a low-tax corporate domicile that looks relatively likely to stay out of reach of Barack Obama's tax-seeking administration.
Over the past six months companies including offshore drilling contractors Noble Corp and Transocean, energy-focused engineering group Foster Wheeler and oilfield services company Weatherfield International have all announced plans to shift domicile to Switzerland.
"Switzerland has a stable and developed tax regime and a network of tax treaties with most countries where we operate," Transocean Chief Executive Bob Long said in a statement in October, when it announced its move. "As a result, the redomestication will improve our ability to maintain a competitive worldwide effective corporate tax rate."
Thank You
3 years ago
3 comments:
TOTALLY AGREE!!!
Oh, God forbid that a corporation should have to pay to support the environment (ie. courts and law enforcement, the system that educated their employees, etc., etc.) that engendered them, allowed them to develop and to be profitable and to survive.
And really, how much corporate tax do they actually pay? Probably $0.
It is not about what they *SHOULD* do...it is about what they *CAN* do. Obviously there is a reason they are leaving. If they were paying $0 in taxes...why would they be heading to a lower tax country???
In addition, I pay a very disproportionate amount of US income taxes ... and to be honest...I would like some of that "investment" I make to remain here in the USA....not head overseas. I would like to think that my children will benefit ... not Sven's children.
But I guess that just makes me a greedy Republican in others' eyes.
Post a Comment